Sleep Timing and Time Tangles
Monday, October 2, 2017 57 Comments
Thoughts about TIME,
Attention Management and Focusby Madelyn Griffith-Haynie, CTP, CMC, A.C.T, MCC, SCAC
TANGLES . . .
Piecing together all of the elements impacting our ability to live a life on purpose is a complex puzzle that is often little more than a mass of tangles.
Something as seemingly simple as SLEEP, for example, seems especially tangled when we are looking at the impact of chronorhythms (brain/body-timing, relative to earth timing cues).
Understanding is further complicated when we lack familiarity with certain words – especially scientific terminology.
We have to call objects and concepts something, of course — and each piece of the what-we-call-things puzzle has a mitigating effect on every other.
Unfortunately, new vocabulary often delays the aha! response, perhaps obfuscating recognition of relationships entirely – in other words, those times when we can’t see the forest for the leaves, never mind the trees!
The need to become familiar with the new lingo is also what I call one of those tiered tasks. It pushes short-term memory to its limit until the new terms become familiar. That, in turn, creates complexities from a myriad of “in-order-to” objectives inherent in the interrelationships of what is, after all, a distributed process.
See also: The Importance of Closing Open Loops:
Open Loops, Distractions and Attentional DysregulationConnections
There is something slippery in this sleep-timing interweaving I can’t quite put my finger on; something that no one else is looking at – at least no one published anyplace I have been able to find!!
Melatonin + corticosteroid release + light cues + core body temperature + gene expression + protein synthesis (and more!) combine to produce individual chronorhythms.
Individual chronorhythms influence not only sleep timing, but ALSO one’s internal “sense of time” — each of which further influences the effectiveness of other domains.
They do not operate in isolation — even though we usually focus on them in isolation, hoping to fully understand their individual contributions.
Here’s the kicker: prior associations
Whether we like it or not, the underlying, less conscious interpretations we associate with whatever words we use “ride along” with the denotative (dictionary) meaning of every single word.
In addition, the moment the terms become integrated into our understanding of the topic, they boundary the conversation — in other words, tethering it to old territory rather than opening new vistas. (See the linguistic portion of What’s in a Name? for a bit about how and why).
Where we begin biases our understanding of new concepts we move on to study, which skews the inter-relationship. Not only that, the relationship between the extent of our understanding of each piece unbalances our understanding of the whole. Or so it seems to me.
Ask Any Mechanic
Setting automobile spark-plug firing efficiently affects engine performance which, in turn, affects a number of other things — gas mileage and tire wear among them.
I doubt that anyone has ever studied it “scientifically,” but every good mechanic has observed the effect in a number of arenas. What we can “prove” is that the engine runs raggedly before spark-plug gapping and smoothly afterwards.
I doubt the entire inter-relationship has been quantified to metrics, so The Skeptics may still scoff at our definition of proof, even while the car-obsessed among them will take their engines to be “buffed.”
It makes me crazy!
To my mind, the overfocus on quantification has become its own problem. Yes, co-occurance does not prove causation, but I prefer a more observational approach day to day. At least, I do not discount it.
“Doctor, it hurts when I do this/don’t do that!“ is ignoring deeper problems, no doubt, but at least it avoids a prescription for pain medication that may well create a problem somewhere else.
But back to sleep timing and inner time sense — problematic for most of us here in Alphabet City.